Our bi-weekly column, Center Field | Art in the Middle with Bad at Sports on Art21â€²s blog has its latest post with an interview with Polyester’s Dirctor Bill Eiseman.Â Check the teaser below and go read the entire article over on Art21â€²s site.
Like many people, my girlfriend and I set out on a road trip this summer. Our trip took us from Chicago to Portland, following most of the Lewis and Clark Trail. After officially starting in St Charles, MO, where Louis and Clark initially met for their historic journey, we headed west, hitting not only typical locations like Yellowstone, The Badlands, and Mount Rushmore, but also a few random towns along the way, like Mitchell, SD (home of the only Corn Palace in the world). I had not planned for our trip to include many museums or galleries, but while driving downtown in Omaha, NE, I spotted the word â€˜Polyesterâ€™ painted in orange on a buildingâ€™s facade. We drove back around the block and to my surprise, it was a bookstore and gallery specializing in contemporary and vintage photographs.
Founded in 2006 by Bill Eiseman in downtown Los Angeles, Polyester has established itself as a unique voice within photography. In 2010, Eiseman moved shop to Omaha, where he has been able to expand his gallery to include screenings. In the spirit of the final days of summer, I asked Bill a few questions about my find in Omaha.
Meg Onli: What prompted a move from such a large scene (Los Angeles) to a place such as Omaha?
Bill Eiseman: It was a decision I spent six months deliberating. The downtown artwalk in Los Angeles brought anywhere from 500 to 1500 people into my gallery on the second Thursday of every month. The crowd at our last monthly artwalk here in downtown Omaha numbered roughly 50. From an economic standpoint, it probably wasnâ€™t the wisest of choices, at least in the short term. But as a gallerist, since I am now the only contemporary photography gallery in the region, suddenly I have the creative freedom to exhibit known, represented artists and works that were previously unavailable to me and in a space that is more than four times the size as its L.A. predecessor (for less rent). [It] also allows me to have both a main gallery and annex, a dedicated video room, present live performances and film screenings â€” pretty much everything I ever wanted to do but never had the space to make a reality. There is also a certain amount of notoriety that comes with being new and unique, which I must admit to enjoying. And I spend (at most) fifteen minutes per day in my car, which is something that Los Angelenos can only dream about.
Read the entire article on art21
Our bi-weekly column, Center Field | Art in the Middle with Bad at Sports on Art21â€™s blog has its latest post with Claudin’e interview with Chicago based artist Alison Ruttan .Â Check the teaser below and go read the entire article over on Art21â€™s site.
Iâ€™ve been reading with great interest some of the posts and friendly debates that have taken place recently on this site concerning the relationship between art and science. As I read, I thought about the many artists I know who enthusiastically draw upon research conducted in the â€œnon-artâ€ fields of science and the humanities. Indeed, a lot of artists today are assuming the role of researcher, not with the idea of superceding scientific modes of inquiry, but in order to supplement or embellish upon them in ways that only art can.
One artist who is particularly adept at bringing multiple fields of inquiry together is Alison Ruttan, a Chicago-based interdisciplinary artist and Adjunct Associate ProfessorÂ at the School of the Art Institute. Ruttanâ€™s body of work revolves around the very basic â€” and yet infinitely complex â€” question of what makes us human. For the past several years, she has made a number of multi-disciplinary artworks that compare human and animal behavior. The types of questions Ruttan poses through her art are similar to those that are asked by an evolutionary biologist, for example, but Ruttanâ€™s questions are open-ended andÂ intended, as she puts it, as â€œa conversation between the maker and the viewer.â€ As an artist, Ruttan seeks â€œa better understanding of the way biology guides our own actions.â€ At the same time, she asks us to consider the degree to which human beings are themselves held captive by the idea of the â€œprimal impulse,â€ whether that impulse is for food, sex, or violent conflict.
Ruttanâ€™s most recent project is titled The Four Year War at Gombe. In it, she uses human actors to restage the civil war that took place within a troop of chimpanzees living in the Gombe Stream Chimpanzee Reserve in western Tanzania.Â This group of chimpanzees lived peacefully together for many years before violently separating into two distinct communities. Relying on Jane Goodallâ€™s extensive research and documentation of this particular group of chimps, Ruttan asked her participants to loosely act out scenes that were depicted or otherwise described in Goodallâ€™s book, Through a Window: My Thirty Years with the Chimpanzees of Gombe. Goodallâ€™s observations led not only to the discovery that chimpanzees wage war on one another, but that they are also capable of long range-planning and strategic thinking. In turn, Ruttanâ€™s investigations lead her to surmise that for chimpanzees, like us, â€œthe bloodiest feuds and civil wars are always waged against those whom we have the closest ties to.â€
I asked Alison Ruttan to tell us a bit more about her Four Year War project, and the role that research plays in her art-making practice.
Claudine Ise: The tribe of chimpanzees that inspired your project The Four Year War at Gombe was extensively documented by Jane Goodall. Can you tell us about Goodallâ€™s work with this particular tribe? What happened to the chimpanzees over the course of Goodallâ€™s research?
Alison Ruttan: Goodall began researching this particular chimpanzee troop in 1960. Her first ten years at Gombe in Tanzania were spent gaining the groupâ€™s trust and understanding the individual relationships within the group. During that time, Goodall wrote about familiar relationships â€” sex, affection and cooperation, social hierarchies and death in the community. Initially she had seen the chimps as almost pure, maybe nicer than human beings. By 1971, this perception began to change when the troop split into two communities and she and her staff witnessed chimps conducting outright warfare. The original group strategically hunted down and killed all the former members of their group. Goodall sadly recognized that like us, chimps also had a dark side.
Read the entire article here.