SOFA 2016 Recap

November 7, 2016 · Print This Article

SOFA aka Sculptural Objects Functional Art and Design turned 23 this year. But that’s not all that Chicago celebrated on SOFA’s opening day. During the pre-opening media viewing, Navy Pier’s Festival Hall buzzed with electricians installing lights atop beeping hydraulic lifts and gallerists arranging their displays, and hummed with unabashed glee—it was the morning after the Cubs triumph.

SOFA 2016

SOFA 2016

Some key SOFA 2016 stats before moving on to particulars: 70 galleries from a dozen countries representing 800 artists; and 30 lectures. SOFA Special Exhibits included: of Ball State University School of Art; Chicago High School for the Arts (ChiArts); Collectors of Wood Art; Glass Art Society; CONNECT, a student design competition with installations from six universities (Purdue University was awarded first place); a live-in installation by Design Industries Foundation Fighting AIDS (DIFFA) Chicago with AIDS survivor and ambassador Jim Petrakis; and the Hot Glass Roadshow from the Corning Glass Museum, a semi-trailer equipped to make glass.

Brent Cole, Ball State University exhibit

Brent Cole, Ball State University exhibit


Kirra Galleries, Australia

Kirra Galleries, Australia

It’s conventional among some art world inhabitants to look down on SOFA as beneath their interest—or as less worthy than art fairs that exclude work with associations to the descriptors craft, design, and decorative arts. For audiences who are interested in what artists and craftspeople create in materials such as glass, metal, wood, plastic, and fiber, SOFA 2016 didn’t disappoint.

Harry Roa Studio

Harry Roa Studio

That’s to say, SOFA isn’t simply for moneyed buyers of eye candy. Its scale makes room for works that are mind candy, feats of eye-hand coordination, and from time to time the results of pure luck. Here’s a selection of SOFA 2016 sights that invited me to look—and look again.

Marzena Krzemi?ska, work in glass, Ball State University exhibit

Marzena Krzemiska, work in glass, Ball State University exhibit


Tom Eckert, Obscured, work in wood, Adam Blaue Gallery

Tom Eckert, Obscured (work in wood), Adam Blaue Gallery


Humaira Abid, Proposal, detail. Abmeyer Wood Fine Art

Humaira Abid, Proposal, detail. Abmeyer Wood Fine Art


Derek Bencomo, Grace and Motion (carved teakwood root), Kirsten Muenster Projects

Derek Bencomo, Grace and Motion (carved teakwood root), Kirsten Muenster Projects


Why Wood? installation view. Collectors of Wood Art exhibit

Why Wood? installation view. Collectors of Wood Art exhibit


Tanya Aguiniga, Mend, detail. Volume Gallery

Tanya Aguiniga, Mend, detail. Volume Gallery


17cb Full circle 1-6; 2016; Caroline Bartlett; Stitched and hand printed linen; cotton thread; imprinted porcelain mounted on acrylic; silk and cotton

Caroline Bartlett, Full Circle, detail. browngrotta arts


Lucy Slivinski, Jeffrey Breslow Gallery

Lucy Slivinsky, Double Vision. Jeffrey Breslow Gallery


Kiel Arto Design, Latvia

Kiel Arto Design (coffee tables from retired cars), Latvia


ChiArts alumni and their works

ChiArts alumni exhibit


ChiArts alumni exhibit

ChiArts alumni exhibit


Miguel Ontiveros, Still Life of Attic, detail. ChiArts alumni exhibit.

Miguel Ontiveros, Still Life of Attic, detail. ChiArts alumni exhibit.


Hona Hideaki, Knot A. Tai Modern

Hona Hideaki, Knot A. Tai Modern


Isohi Setsuko, Hamakaze (Sea Breeze). Tai Modern

Isohi Setsuko, Hamakaze (Sea Breeze). Tai Modern


Dona Look, #15-2. browngrotta arts

Dona Look, #15-2. browngrotta arts


Urban Nature: A Recycled Sanctuary, detail of exhibition, Purdue University students. CONNECT winner

Urban Nature: A Recycled Sanctuary,  detail of installation, Purdue University. CONNECT winner


Steffen Dam, Flowerblock, Heller Gallery

Steffen Dam, Flowerblock, Heller Gallery


Karen Bexfield, Enigma 3, Winterowd Fine Art

Karen Bexfield, Enigma 3 (glass), Winterowd Fine Art


Michael Enn Sirvet (powder coated aluminum), Christopher Martin Gallery

Michael Enn Sirvet, detail (powder coated aluminum), Christopher Martin Gallery


John Kiley, Fractographst, Adam Blaue Gallery

John Kiley, Fractographst, Adam Blaue Gallery


Fractographstist's tools, Adam Blaue Gallery booth

The Fractographst’s tools, Adam Blaue Gallery booth


TOP V. WEEKEND PICKS (11/3-11/9)

November 3, 2016 · Print This Article

Every thought in our head is just like every other thought in someone else’s, fleeting and imagined. We can and will be incomplete together, through the reproducible action of sharing the stories of ourselves with one another. Flowing streams of narrative, of fragments of things that are past, and the things that we imagine the future to be made of while standing beside something that’s demanding, or soft, or a little bit unkempt. The vulnerability of our imaginings is tidal.  A consequence of our humanity as it is indulged, begrudged, sacrificed, and savored.


1. Talisman

November 4, 2016, 7-10PM
Work by: Em Kettner and Jessie Mott
Fernwey: 916 N Damen Ave, Chicago, IL 60622


2. Virgenes de la Puerta

November 4, 2016, 5-7:30PM
Work by: Juan Jose Barboza-Gubo and Andrew Mroczek
Schneider Gallery: 770 N LaSalle Dr, Suite 401, Chicago, IL 60654


3. Round and Round

November 4, 2016, 6-9PM
Work by: Johana Moscoso
Chicago Artists Coalition: 217 N Carpenter St, Chicago, IL 60607


4. Plants, Window, Cloud, Tails

November 4, 2016, 6-9PM
Work by: You Ni Chae
ADDS DONNA: 3252 W North Ave, Chicago, IL 60647


5. Sara Ludy

November 5, 2016, 8-10PM
Graham Foundation for Advanced Studies in the Fine Arts: 4 W Burton Pl, Chicago, IL 60610


Hey Chicago, submit your events to the Visualist here:

TOP V. WEEKEND PICKS (10/27-11/2)

October 27, 2016 · Print This Article

1. She Made for Her

November 1, 2016, 5 PM
Work by: Anna Tsouhlarakis
Neubauer Collegium for Culture and Society: 5701 S Woodlawn Ave, Chicago, IL 60637


2. 40 Years – Part 2: Gender. Race. Identity

October 28, 2016, 5-7:30PM
Work by: Vito Acconci, Derrick Adams, Ghada Amer, Dawoud Bey, Richard Billingham, James Drake, Natalie Frank, Luis Gispert, Mike Glier, Susan Hefuna, Robert Heinecken, Deana Lawson, Judy Ledgerwood, Zanele Muholi, Nathaniel Mary Quinn, Cindy Sherman, Lorna Simpson, Kiki Smith, Michalene Thomas, Carrie Mae Weems, and Kehinde Wiley
Rhona Hoffman Gallery: 118 N Peoria St, Chicago, IL 60607


3. Every link is a separation

October 29, 2016, 6-9PM
Work by: Fidencio Martinez, Noël Morical, and Valentina Zamfirescu
Slow: 2153 W 21st St, Chicago, IL 60608



October 30, 2016, 4-7PM
Work by: Ellis von Sternberg
4th Ward Project Space: 5338 S Kimbark Ave, Chicago, IL 60615



October 29, 2016, 7-10PM
Work by: Marcel Alcalá
Boyfriends: 3311 W Carroll Ave, Chicago, IL 60624


Hey Chicago, submit your events to the Visualist here:

Bumping Into Sculpture at EXPO Chicago

October 25, 2016 · Print This Article

Guest post by Brent Fogt


Barnett Newman famously observed that “Sculpture is what you bump into when you back up to see a painting,” poking fun at sculpture’s secondary status in the eyes of many art lovers. Though painting was definitely king at this year’s Expo Chicago —with a veritable sea of canvases flooding the gallery booths — nestled among them was a wealth of dynamic, compelling sculpture in a wide range of styles, materials and ideas.

Just inside Festival Hall, a group of tall, masked figures by Magdalena Abakanow seemed to stand guard, sentinel like, over the artwork around it. Nearby, three of Jaume Plensa’s narrow, contemplative heads rested, eyes closed, providing a quiet counterpoint to Abakanow’s work. The prominent placement of work by these artists was fitting, as both have strong Chicago ties (Abakanow created Agora, the group of 106 headless and armless iron sculptures at the south end of Grant Park and Pleansa, Millennium Park’s Crown Plaza).


Work by Jaume Plensa (left) and Magdalena Abakanow (right). Photos by the author for Bad at Sports.

Perhaps less familiar to Chicago audiences was work by Anuar Maauad. His thick, rough-hewn figures, on display at Efrain Lopez Gallery in Expo’s EXPOSURE section allude not only to Abakanow’s sculptures in their absence of facial and bodily detail but also to classical sculpture with subtle postural gestures such as a bent knee and a hint of contrapposto. Visible tool marks and lines demarcating sections of the sculpture break up the surfaces and create a captivating play of light and shadow. As with Abakanow’s work, Anuar’s surfaces are as vital as the forms themselves.


Work by Anuar Maauad. Photos by the author for Bad at Sports.

At the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) booth, Sipho Mabona exhibited a stark white, 4 ft.-tall origami elephant calf made from a single sheet of paper. In spite of the lightness of his materials, Mabona manages to infuse the elephant with weight and gravity. To build an elephant from one sheet of paper is a remarkable feat of engineering, and the fragility of the paper is an apt metaphor for the devastating effects of the ivory trade on elephant populations.


Work by Sipho Mabona. Photo by the author for Bad at Sports.

Though figurative sculpture played a starring role in this year’s Art Expo, plenty of non-figurative sculpture was featured as well, much of it infused with familiar, everyday materials. Viewers familiar with Anthony Caro’s groundbreaking painted steel sculptures from the early 1960s, which discarded with the traditional pedestal and seemed to spread out horizontally along the floor, may have been surprised to see a series of tightly arranged table pieces from his Arena series of the 1990s at Álvaro Alcázar Gallery. Whereas the steel pieces from earlier in his career were spacious and open, these works, which incorporate pieces of furniture and other carefully crafted wooden objects, are densely packed and almost claustrophobic.


Work by Anthony Caro. Photos by the author for Bad at Sports.

One of the most provocative pieces at Expo Chicago was a long, shallow sculpture by Jumana Manna at CRG Gallery. Bulging egg-shaped forms of varying sizes hug one side of a tiny wooden fence. The eggs seem to be growing, and the fence shrinking, before your eyes. The fence could be interpreted as girding and protecting the eggs, but given this year’s presidential election and accompanying proposals to build impenetrable barriers around the United States, the fence could just as easily be seen as excluding and denying entry.


Work by Jumana Manna. Photo by the author for Bad at Sports.

Allison Wade, another artist who deftly combines materials to subvert expectations, exhibited two small sculptures at Devening Projects + Editions’ booth. In one piece, Wade suspends a small ceramic shard from a piece of thin steel bent into an upside-down “U”. A piece of bleached wood forms the base. Like much of Wade’s work, this sculpture fully exploits the potential of line to create space and visual tension. Wade recently put on a terrific show, Know Better, at Devening Projects in Chicago’s East Garfield Park. Working with the motif of the stairway, she exhibited sculptures of exquisitely composed objects that brought to mind altars, shrines or other places of contemplation.


Work by Allison Wade.

While Allison Wade’s sculptures seem to expand the space around them, Robert Burnier’s brightly painted aluminum pieces, displayed at Andrew Rafacz’s booth, seem to condense it. The work is folded inward upon itself, hiding an interior space from view. The folds have a casual quality — resembling, perhaps, a paper airplane or origami project gone awry — that belie the meticulous nature of Burnier’s process. The vivid colors, strong forms, and the play of light and shadow merge to reward sustained and careful viewing.


Work by Robert Burnier. Photos by the author for Bad at Sports.

In addition to sculpture, Expo Chicago featured two immersive installations that provided a much-needed respite from booth hopping. Leonard Suryajaya’s eye-popping, psychedelic installation at the Chicago Artist Coalition’s booth combined collage, video and photography to investigate the role of women in his native Indonesia. With every object, surface and wall obsessively collaged, Suryajaya’s installation is less a room and more a pure field of color and pattern with occasional interruptions of light and shade.

“Using my own confusing background as a primary source of questioning and aesthetic inspiration, I create visual experiences that provoke similarly personal responses from the viewer, while remaining rooted in the specificity of my experience and that of my subjects,” Suryajaya explains.


Work by Leonard Suryajaya. Photos by the author for Bad at Sports.

Sabina Ott’s equally immersive installation, located downstairs from the main hall, could not be more different from the densely patterned CAC booth. Whereas Suryajaya’s installation overwhelms with color and information, Ott’s piece is quiet and understated. Reminiscent of the colossal, interactive mountain she created at the Hyde Park Art Center, Ott’s installation is a series of covered passageways built of white Styrofoam. With small works of art to contemplate throughout the structure, her installation is the perfect antidote to the visual overstimulation and chaos of the art scene upstairs, a peaceful place that encourages introspection.


Work by Sabina Ott. Photos by the author for Bad at Sports.

The diversity and quality of sculpture at this year’s Art Expo was absolutely first rate. With all due respect to Barnett Newman, this sculpture was not an obstacle you bumped into while looking at paintings. Rather, the sculpture was something that bumped into you.

Tom Denlinger’s Ekstatic Edgewater at the Chicago Cultural Center

October 24, 2016 · Print This Article

Interview with Lise McKean

Elmdale 19

Elmdale 19

LM: Let’s jump in the deep end and start by talking about your interest in dada, surrealism, fluxus, and the book your co-edited The Exquisite Corpse: Chance and Collaboration in Surrealism’s Parlor Game. Let’s hear about how these interests seep into your art work.

TD: My interest in surrealism and dada relates to my interest in the irrational. Like the surrealists I’m interested in circumventing certain aspects of culture that cause us to produce in certain expected ways. For my own artwork, I try to plumb areas I can’t predict. What excites me most of all is making works that surprise me in some way.

So on the level of how I work, it’s important to me to have an element of surprise in the way the works come out. On a level of almost ideology, I’m sympathetic to the surrealists who were trying to make artwork that was not culturally predetermined. They used dreams as source material, or collective games like exquisite corpse. No one person can control the outcome. They were trying to make work that was rooted in the irrational and beyond any one person’s control.



LM: I’ve been following your work since the mid-1990s and am intrigued by how you explore ideas both conceptually and formally. It seems to me that several of your major bodies of work—Lawns, Frame b, and Financial District evoke questions about in-betweenness. What interests you about interstitial spaces?

TD: I’m interested in how we navigate the physical world. My interest in the shapes of lawns involved me standing on the sidewalk, looking through the camera, and pointing it down from my particular height to find a place to get the whole lawn. Lawns pieces allude to the fact I had to collect that information to make the photograph. That carries over into later works in which I explore the form of spaces between buildings. It also alludes to the fact that the spaces are there for bodies to move through, and they’re also made by bodies moving through them. Spaces where public interest intersects with private property are spaces for walking, collecting garbage, and countless other activities. How our physical world resolves itself in these built spaces is very much a concern to me.

LM: What kind of in-betweenness is the focus in the series of photographs you call Frame b?

TD: In Frame b photographs, I was shooting through my fingers. I started doing it in reference to the photographic mistake—you’re taking a photo and your finger slips in front of the lens. It happens even more often with cell phone cameras.  As I made these mistakes, I realized I was inserting the body into the photograph. I liked having the body as a literal framing device for the photo. Usually the framing done by the photographer’s body is unseen because the body taking the picture is behind rather than in front of the lens.

Body Frame, installation view Vaishali, India

Body Frame, installation view in Vaishali, India

LM: Body Frame was one of the works from Frame b that I included in the show I brought to India. Viewers were intrigued by it and had all sorts of interpretations of what they were seeing.

TD: In many of the Frame b photos my fingers ended up looking like naked legs. So that brought up the idea of nakedness, and brought into play the idea of voyeurism. Frame b conjoins ideas of landscape, voyeurism, and the male gaze. I was humorously referring to all these in a very ham-handed way, if you will. Frame b was a continuation of work on the body and landscape that became in The Financial District a more concerted investigation of the body within an economically determined space. I started taking photos of spaces between buildings in 1995. When the financial crisis hit in 2008, I wanted to address specifically the idea of the body within a financial framework. The body is something we all have, and as units within a social system, the body is part of the social contract: everyone’s body should be taken care of. But this clearly wasn’t happening. Voters were misled or misguided into opposing taxes and other instruments that could bring money into systems that could direct it to social services. At the same time political bodies and institutions took advantage of the fears of voters so they could redirect money away from social services.

The Financial District, installation view

Financial District, installation view

LM: You mean 2008 was a windfall for policies that take away money for public services for people who most need it and give money to the for-profit sector.

TD: Yes, I wanted to address the broken system and ask what would have to be done to direct more money into the social sphere so people could recover. But there was a lot of resistance from large financial interests who wanted money to keep flowing to them. I wanted to reinsert the body—the bodies that were being ignored—into the financial system.

LM: Again your approach is both literalist and witty. Just as you inserted your fingers into your Frame b photos as a shout out to the body on the other side of the lens, in the Financial District you juxtapose photos of the sky as framed by buildings on the four corners of LaSalle Street intersections with photos of your bare body, and particularly your butt. What’s going on with the contorted poses and mooning?

TD:  I wanted to pose my body to mimic the shapes between the buildings and use the juxtaposed photos as something to meditate on and then write about. Most of the photos show my naked butt, and the way I’m bending over is more than suggestive. In fact, the full title of the book that resulted from this project is Financial District: 16 Suggested Positions for the Middle Class.

LM: And I recall the photos were shown in a pop up space on Michigan Avenue not far from the Art Institute. It was a fitting for Financial District to be shown in an empty, half-gutted space that itself was symptomatic of the 2008 crash. Before we get to Ekstatic Edgewater, let’s pause at A Neighborhood Piazza, your installation at the CTA’s Jarvis Street station on the Red Line.  Take us through how you came up with the idea and went about realizing it.

TD:  My proposal to the CTA was based on the notion of the piazza. And as it so happens there is a small square or piazza two doors down from the station in front of the alderman’s office. And there’s another one across the street. I lived near the Jarvis stop when I began photographing the spaces between residential buildings. For researching the CTA proposal I went to the stop, and starting at the intersection of Jarvis and Greenview going east and then west, I took photos along Jarvis of spaces between buildings.

A Neighborhood Piazza, CTA Jarvis station

A Neighborhood Piazza, CTA Jarvis station

LM: So you had the piazza idea and took photos of spaces between buildings near Jarvis. How did you transform these into A Neighborhood Piazza?

TD: I was thinking about the space that people move through in order to commute to work and do whatever they need to get done outside of their home. So I made a grid out of all the photos of the spaces in between the buildings. This goes back to my interest in the irrational—I wanted to do something a little out of my control but I still wanted to refer to public space. So I made this grid and approached it very rationally by dividing it into six equal parts. And then I started making it into the artworks. For A Neighborhood Piazza, I used the entire grid and started shaping it using Photoshop. I wanted to treat it as a fabric.

LM: By fabric do you mean that you wanted to treat it as a continuous piece?

TD: Yes, I shaped it to be flowing. It was no longer a grid. I reduced the fabric to one color by reducing the grid of photos to the dark and light areas that emphasized the connections between the different photos. This led to a lot of the photographic information being dropped out.

LM: So this sounds like the fabric became one color, with the light and dark shades creating a lot of texture.

TD: Like a silhouette. I floated that fabric in front of a full color grid of the spaces between buildings. So you could see pieces of the houses and trees, and it seemed as if you were looking at complete houses. But you weren’t. You were looking at pieces of houses that connected to each other. You were looking at the spaces. I used the two things, the fabric and the houses to make a shallow space become a piazza of sorts. And inside the piazza I placed a couple of trees that formed a circular flow to evoke the changing seasons. I wanted the piece to represent the flow of time and people through this space.

A Neighborhood Piazza, detail

A Neighborhood Piazza, detail

LM: And the flow of people is literal too, because the work flanks the stairway leading to the platform.

TD: Yes, passengers flow in and out of the train, along the platform, through the station, and up and down Jarvis—and of course up and down the Red Line.

LM: To follow up on your invocation of piazza. The fact that you call it a piazza rather than a square, plaza, or place, is prompted by your many Italian connections: your heritage, your Italian wife, teaching in Loyola’s Rome program, creating work that references Italian architecture, with some finding their way into collections in Italy. Can you talk about your Italian connections and how they come into this work.

TD: My past is infused with my mother talking about her Italian family. My grandparents were immigrants to Ohio. My mother told us what it was like to grow up as the daughter of immigrants. Marrying an Italian woman deepens my ties to Italy. Being in Italy confirms my preference for neighborhoods that are mixed, made up of people from various backgrounds. The piazza is also part of this Italian connection. It’s where people gather. They enjoy going and being there.

LM: It’s a place to talk to friends and strangers and watch people.

TD: Yes, it’s a gathering place. In this case the CTA station is a place that brings people together. It’s a place where people observe each other. For regular commuters—I go downtown the same time every Friday—you come to notice the regulars and the people who are new.

LM: The CTA is a kind of moving piazza. Does your CTA work draw on anything particular from the Italian aesthetic tradition or is it more about a way of being in space and time?

TD: It’s funny because my mother who was the Italian side of the family had a very laissez faire approach to mealtimes. She insisted we had dinner together but was pretty relaxed about how we went about it. My wife has a very different approach. Dining is a ritual, it’s sacred. You eat things in a specific order. It’s rooted in communal enjoyment, of being together in space and time. The nutritional aspect of eating is incorporated into communal space. I’m always impressed by the importance of communal space in Italy.

Ekstatic Edgewater, installation view

Ekstatic Edgewater, installation view

LM: Talking about communal space brings us to Ekstatic Edgewater. It’s your current show at the Cultural Center, a public building that creates a communal space for artistic and cultural life in Chicago. I used to live in Edgewater and it’s currently your neighborhood. What’s ecstatic about it?

TD: Ekstatic Edgewater is kind of a comic title. Edgewater is a quiet neighborhood. Once I started the CTA project, I started looking more closely at where I live. Once I saw a sign “Edgewater-Rogers Park” on a viaduct. It joins the two together even though they’re usually thought of as two separate neighborhoods.

LM: Your new work straddles photography and sculpture. I remember once you showed me a tangerine peel that you were letting dry out to see what form it would take. Ecstatic Edgewater has work whose forms aren’t unlike that tangerine peel. Can you talk about this new body of work that’s in both paper and metal? And don’t leave out how your color tests figure into it.

Jarvis 7, detail

Jarvis 7, detail

TD: A few different things are going on there. The Jarvis pieces in Ecstatic Edgewater are the ones that are orange. They’re the first ones I made after the CTA project. I wanted to keep the work connected to a place in time as in photography, but I wanted take it in a different direction. I wanted the work to be more tangible and material than a photograph—to interact with space in a more visceral way. So this led them to move into three dimensional space.

LM Is that where the sculptural forms come in?

TD: With the sculptural I’m circling back to where I had come from. In the late 80s and early 90s I started making photographs of landscapes in order to explore sculptural shapes. I wanted the shapes to come from photography.

LM: What’s the role of photography in Ecstatic Edgewater’s exploration of shape and dimensionality?

Jarvis 2

Jarvis 2

TD: I came to see photographs no longer as images but as collections of data. I treated the camera as a data collection device. So I wanted to use that data to generate sculptural objects that nonetheless had an indexical connection to a time and place, as does a photograph. I wanted to keep the indexical connection, but to have the thing making the connection be a three dimensional object. At the same time I wanted an element of irrationality, an element of surprise in the pieces. In order to do that I cut up the Jarvis grid of photographs between buildings into equal parts, meaning I had no control over what was in each part. Then I decided to manipulate each part. The manipulation took the form of laser cutting information from the photo into heavy paper and then draping the laser cut paper on the wall into a variety of shapes.

LM: What do you mean by information from the photo?

TD: I had the computer follow contour information between light and dark areas in the photo.

LM: What is being cut out by the laser cutting?

TD: It follows the lines. I don’t have a lot of control over the cutting. It follows the lines where two areas meet. It’s often a dark and light area; or it can be two sides of the line.

LM: Let’s get into color.

Sample Series, Ekstatic Edgewater installation view

TD: The pieces called Samples Series are different because each one is a particular photograph, whereas the other ones are collections of photographs. Using Photoshop I averaged the colors in the photograph to come up with 14 different color positions.

LM: Is 14 a number you chose randomly?

TD: The color wheel usually has 12 so I chose to go two beyond the color wheel as a way of going beyond conventional color theory. Then I organized the colors according to the amount of surface area each color covered in the photograph. I organized those colors on the z axis. That’s why it looks like a target.

LM: So color is indexical. The center color covers the least amount of area in both the work and in the photograph.

TD: Yes, although there’s a certain amount of interpretation going on there.

LM: What about the cut outs in the Sample Series?

TD: As in the Jarvis works, the information was water cut through the metal. The Sample Series works reference Josef Albers in wonky ways. They have holes in them. They have the target, which is one version of perspectival space. The smallest space is in the center. But what I cut into that is another representation of perspectival space from the camera. The holes cut through the metal create a tension with the colors printed on the metal. And I love the way the perforated steel looks as stylized as Chinese cloud paintings. But it’s the opposite because it’s not a repetition of similar marks. I like that it references some kind of idea of infinity and at the same time references another kind of artwork.

Thorndale 3

Thorndale 3

LM: There’s something distinctive, even unusual about the palette in Sample Series. It has a synthetic, inorganic feel to it. Is that from averaging all the colors in each photos into 14 colors?

TD: The tool in Photoshop samples individual pixels, and each pixel can be of different intensity. You can get a huge range when using this sampling tool. Simultaneous contrast is the way the position of colors in relation to each other affect our perception of them. Visual color mixing is used in printing technology, in which dots of different colors sit next to each other. In some ways I’m exploring in a different media problems experienced by painters and chemists in the nineteenth century. For me, one solution might be to average everything mathematically. Some artists have done that, for example Jason Salavon has a number of different projects using color averaging. Getting back to what you said about the palatte not looking like colors in photographs. I don’t know what to say.

LM: There are a lot of variables go into the making of sampled color.

TD: The color you end up with is different from what was anticipated. I see that as another chance operation. I’ve been talking to some people about applying algorithms to average a color group, and send it through the system and see what happens—send it to my printer and see what comes back to me. There’s a student in my class who’s a programmer and I’m going to work with him to develop an algorithm to average color values. The slightly different thing we’re doing is choosing 14 different positions and then averaging within each position.

LM: What’s next?

TD: I’m not sure I want to give more control to the computer with the algorithm, but I’m definitely going down the road of using more chance operations. I’ll be looking to balance chance operations and things more determined while maintaining an indexical link to a place in time.

Norwood 2

Norwood 2