Iâ€™ve been part of an EU endeavor called City (Re)Searches. It started in Kaunas Lithuania, went on to Cork, and last month was for four days in Belfast; in June it will return to Kaunas and conclude in Rotterdam two years from its start.Â Yet the initiation of this program was years before in the planning and it will continue, no doubt, in independent and intersecting ways for years to come. This is because City (Re)Searches is an undertaking that, as researchers, we fold into the stream of our already conscious and highly developed practices, and will incorporate into the evolving discourses in which we participate.
Each meeting is framed and informed by being in the place it occurs.
The exchange in Belfast was dedicated to the topic of cultural agency at this time of social and economic change in Ireland (and we can say worldwide) that is also creating new contexts for culture and creativity. As a team of 15â€”artists, curators, arts administrators, social service organizersâ€”we each come at culture in a different way.
So it was not surprising that co-researcher Ciaran Smyth, whose training is in philosophy, drew from Greg Sholetteâ€™s Dark Matter: Art and Politics in the Age of Enterprise Culture (NY: Pluto Press, 2011) in one of the presentations. We, as thisÂ author evokes, represent a mixture inside and outside the art world, working in the dark and in the light, each holding varying definitions of art and having aesthetic persuasions that can even be uncomfortable for each other.Â Still, as a group, we share the sense that culture and creativity have the potential to challenge and influence the outcome of our timesâ€”and thatâ€™s the beauty of the â€œcuratingâ€ job done by organizer Ed Carroll in assembling this working/thinking group.
Sholetteâ€™s dark matter, he says, is â€œthe bulk of the artistic activity produced in our post-industrial society,â€ and â€œis invisible primarily to those who lay claim to the management and interpretation of culture-the critics, art historians, collectors, dealers, museums, curators, and arts administrators.â€ It â€œincludes makeshift, amateur, informal, unofficial, autonomous, activist, non-institutional, self-organized practicesâ€¦.â€ Still it seems to me that this author is defining another, alternative art world. What about the world? What did Bucky tell us? â€œStart with the universe.â€ That would be apt beginning for his astrophysical allusion.
In focusing on cultural labor, Sholette pulls in the concept of â€œthe good life.â€ He offers the example of the Berlin-based art and media collective Kleines Postfordistisches Drama (KPD), who created a fictional “sociological” documentary about creative industry workers just like themselves. Their conclusion: â€œBased on actual responses, the project reveals Berlin’s creative workers trapped in their own feeble expectations about a “good life.”
But what about the good life? In Belfast we were sharing time with a range of people who trusted us enough to articulate actual responses out loud, telling us and each other what was good and what was not in their life, and speculating on how culture might make it better. No one thought what they had to say would be feeble.
The Belfast conversation was not just about supporting enrichments or extending access to entertainment, though these ways of experiencing culture were there, too: from classes to community care programs to opera to technology. But it was also about imagining a wider narrative that can enable a realization of the part we each playâ€”not divided into dark and light matterâ€”and one where the possibility of everyoneâ€™s own agency can come into the foreground. This is maybe not always result in changing the world, but it can lead to life well lived.
Cultural agency is not dependant on artists, though their way of seeing and practicing can offer moments of insight and real vision. One thing we know well in Chicago is that by working in collaboration, participating in making culture, we have agency in the world. This cultural agency is about self and collective determination.
But in Belfast it seemed important to bear in mind that we all have agency when we are conscious of being in the dynamic process that is life. Itâ€™s human pursuit we share, not just an art pursuit that artists undertake or invite us to participate in. While artists can make this process their art, this way of being is available to any of us. We all share with artists this way of being, if we care and are invested in the making and living of life. By living what we believe, through our work and life, be it art or something else, we give form to our beliefs and communicate them to others. Thatâ€™s agency.
The theme of cultural agency for Belfast was proposed by team member Niall Crowley, former chief executive of the Irish Equality Authority because this concept is at the heart of the City (Re)Searches initiative. As the active element of culture, agency focuses â€œour attention on issues of power and status as well as on issues of practice and action,â€ noted Crowley.Â But as researchers, we are not, as Sholette outs it, â€œcultural producers, as role models for society, [who] join with other social movements to work towards new forms of globalization?” Rather we are listeners with the belief that, by working from a position that everyone has cultural agency, we can change the inequality that exists today in regard to whose cultural agency is exercised and valued.
We are familiar with social art practiceâ€™s ability to provoke reconsideration of the way things are and seek change. Ireland has its exemplars, too. We see this spirit, for instance, in the five-year effort of artist Seamus McGuinness who, with psychiatrist Kevin Malone, has worked with 102 families throughout Ireland who have lost family members to suicide. Their â€œLived Livesâ€ project was so much about the future that they are continuing this work and in some ways, I am sure, they will do so all their lives.
We see it in the lifeâ€™s work of Marie Barrett who continually turns the earth that is Donegal. She understands the depth of this place, land and sea. She listens to the citizens who co-inhabit her birthplace and home, and she enables them to share their stories both beautifully and resonantly, to understand and make known what it is be of and in this place now and into the future.
To enact such a short-term, yet alive moment of critical and incisive dimension in Belfast, Jeanne van Heeswijk, artist and team member, proposed an emergency pop-up structure for the public discussions; this structure will follow us around to next sites.
It became the setting for researchers and community participants to engage a debate on who are the cultural agents in our society, what is the purpose of this agency, and what future developments are required for equality in cultural agency.
As the sole researcher from outside the EU, it strikes me that City (Re)Searchers is a rare privilege, all the more remarkable because the outcomes are open-ended and not pre-determined. Â In projects like this (and there aren’t many), there is a sense of trust on the part of funders and participants that something of value will be learned, even if the lines of process are nearly always blurred and become convoluted, take dead-end tangents. But then this is a path of true discovery.
It is also an act of trust among the researchers. Curiously, this is something we find we have to continually reaffirm to ourselves; even if trust is our oft-recited mantra to the communities we work with in our individual ways. We who are often the organizers of others are finding that we are in need of arriving at a way of working with each other, bringing our strategies together and yet setting them aside, balancing pragmatics and poetics. Itâ€™s a matter of trust in the making and in the waiting.