Wendy and Lucy

May 5, 2009 · Print This Article


On Sunday I went to Doc Films to check out Kelly Reichardt’s (“Old Joy”, “River of Grass”) latest film “Wendy and Lucy”. The film is only 120 minutes. In that time we wander through a Pacific Northwest town as Wendy (Michelle Williams) attempts to find her dog, fix her car, and continue her way to Alaska. I went into the film thinking of it as a classic road trip movie. When I left I felt like the film was much more about the struggles that people face when interacting with strangers.

Both the film and Williams have received a lot of critical acclaim. I found it easy to believe the situations that Wendy faced and the amount of strength the character had to gather in order to make it through the 3 days that we see. I also liked the ambiguity of the previous circumstances that led her to where she is. As a character Wendy is rather solemn, for obvious reasons, while Lucy, her golden dog with floppy ears, appears to be one of the few things that actually holds her together.

The plot is a little sparse which I think gives Williams the opportunity to shine. One of the more pivotal scenes in the film is when a friendly security guard hands Wendy a wad of money and insists that she takes it. Once he leaves, its hard not to feel the devastating blow that what had looked like a lot of money was actually only $7.

A. O. Scott summed up the poignancy of the film, “But underneath this plain narrative surface – or rather, resting on it the way a smooth stone rests in your palm – is a lucid and melancholy inquiry into the current state of American society. Much as “Old Joy” turned a simple encounter between two longtime friends into a meditation on manhood and responsibility at a time of war and political confusion, so does “Wendy and Lucy” find, in one woman’s partly self-created hard luck, an intimation of more widespread hard times ahead.”

Wendy and Lucy is available today, May 5th on dvd.

4 thoughts on “Wendy and Lucy”

  1. BC says:

    “The film is only 120 minutes” — ? How long do you need a film to be?

  2. Richard says:

    Meg’s favorite movie is the 6 hour long 1927 film “Napoleon” so if it clocks in at under 3 hours she considers it a “short feature”.

  3. Meg says:

    I’ve actually watched the 5 hour long film lagaan 3 times. I enjoy wasting my life.

  4. Richard says:

    Clearly, you are a part of bad at sports!

Comments are closed.

Point of Origin

  • No results yet!