Comments on: Episode 201: Deb Sokolow

By: A New Twist on Deb Sokolow’s “The Way in Which Things Operate” : Bad at Sports

Sun, 09 Aug 2009 21:46:16 +0000

[...] was interviewed on Episode 201 of the Podcast. Give it a listen if you haven’t already! (Via Windy [...]

By: Balzac

Balzac — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 22:37:38 +0000

Amy,

The funny thing is that while it may not have appeared before, it is one of the first few results now, due to the preceding comment.

By: Amy

Amy — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 18:07:38 +0000

Weird, Deb, when I google Amando Carrillo Fuentes your page doesn’t come up at all (well, at least in the first 6 pages). Same goes if you search +art or +chicago. So I’m going to have to agree with you that it’s odd you’re getting hits from those places.

And, narratives are fun.

By: Steve Kush Ruiz

Steve Kush Ruiz — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 22:13:31 +0000

Show was great, but this comment thread rules.

By: edmar

edmar — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 23:55:31 +0000

Don’t allow these details to frustrate you. As you know nothing is ever perfect due to deadlines. The great thing is that you can always fix the errors and edit them here, on the interweb, as they are discovered.

An important fact to emphasize is that this interview with Deb is great. Thank you guys. Keep up the wonderful and valuable work Team BAS.

By: Richard

Richard — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 22:53:21 +0000

All,

Okay, so for now and to prevent further confusion, etc. we will strike the offending text and if Deb wants to send us something I’ll replace it and hopefully this resolves the concerns.

Richard

By: John Q. Public

John Q. Public — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 22:33:15 +0000

Just because the galleries have closed it isn’t appropriate to list them as places her work has been shown? Your scolding contains some odd logic.

By: Holly Wilson

Holly Wilson — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 22:01:19 +0000

Hi,
I stumbled across this commentary recently, and as a collector of Deb Sokolow’s work, I am glad to see that you cleared up the misunderstanding, because the implication of the initial comment was that she did not furnish information that was requested in a timely manner.
It may be worth taking the time to find current information on the artist to avoid doing them (and yourselves, honestly) a disservice. A couple of teh galleries you mentioned have closed and there is no mention of a current show. Speaking as a collector, I would appreciate having current information, particularly aboutan exhibit that is up when the podcast is released.
If it would not be too arduous, perhaps you would be able to correct the entry since Ms. Sokolow has offered to send you current information.
I appreciate what you do and understand that this is a volunteer effort, but your credibility as a journalistic presence can be more secure when you include more relevant and accurate information along with the always interesting interviews.
Thank you.

By: Deb Sokolow

Deb Sokolow — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:55:59 +0000

Thanks Richard. Our friendship is staying intact here, no worries!

By: Richard

Richard — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:33:39 +0000

Deb,

No accusations were meant to be implied in your general direction. The statement posted was an error on our part, not yours.