<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Curate This! Offers Latest Contest Model for Contemporary Art Exhibitions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://badatsports.com/2009/curate-this-offers-latest-contest-model-for-group-exhibitions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://badatsports.com/2009/curate-this-offers-latest-contest-model-for-group-exhibitions/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rss</link>
	<description>Contemporay art talk without the ego</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:04:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Welke</title>
		<link>http://badatsports.com/2009/curate-this-offers-latest-contest-model-for-group-exhibitions/comment-page-1/#comment-86892</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Welke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 22:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://badatsports.com/?p=10749#comment-86892</guid>
		<description>It seems to me contests are a positive if they get more people looking at original works, but with &quot;democratization&quot; might come dilution. 

I don&#039;t think the public at large would violate the &quot;no poop photographs, no naked ladies, no same-sex coupling&quot; theoretical restrictions you mention in your post discussing &quot;Art Prize,&quot; nor -- history suggests -- would they choose Van Gogh, Picasso, etc. 

Maybe if the general public were narrowed down to fellow artists, voting anonymously, but, still, the truly open minded might not prevail. Its a perpetual quandary for the artist -- finding that sympathetic critic -- I think.

If you support the arts, you may like to know that I&#039;ve just launched a new site devoted to art, www.grassfedart.com, and invite artists and artisans to join.

You&#039;ll be the first, or among the first.

Thanks!
-- Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me contests are a positive if they get more people looking at original works, but with &#8220;democratization&#8221; might come dilution. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the public at large would violate the &#8220;no poop photographs, no naked ladies, no same-sex coupling&#8221; theoretical restrictions you mention in your post discussing &#8220;Art Prize,&#8221; nor &#8212; history suggests &#8212; would they choose Van Gogh, Picasso, etc. </p>
<p>Maybe if the general public were narrowed down to fellow artists, voting anonymously, but, still, the truly open minded might not prevail. Its a perpetual quandary for the artist &#8212; finding that sympathetic critic &#8212; I think.</p>
<p>If you support the arts, you may like to know that I&#8217;ve just launched a new site devoted to art, <a href="http://www.grassfedart.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.grassfedart.com</a>, and invite artists and artisans to join.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll be the first, or among the first.</p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
&#8211; Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Visual Art &#187; Curate This! Offers Latest Contest Model for Contemporary Art &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://badatsports.com/2009/curate-this-offers-latest-contest-model-for-group-exhibitions/comment-page-1/#comment-86883</link>
		<dc:creator>Visual Art &#187; Curate This! Offers Latest Contest Model for Contemporary Art &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://badatsports.com/?p=10749#comment-86883</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more:  Curate This! Offers Latest Contest Model for Contemporary Art &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more:  Curate This! Offers Latest Contest Model for Contemporary Art &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

