<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Controversial Exhibition Suspended In San Francisco</title>
	<atom:link href="http://badatsports.com/2008/controversial-exhibition-suspended-in-san-francisco/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://badatsports.com/2008/controversial-exhibition-suspended-in-san-francisco/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rss</link>
	<description>Contemporay art talk without the ego</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:04:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Bridgit Gilmore</title>
		<link>http://badatsports.com/2008/controversial-exhibition-suspended-in-san-francisco/comment-page-1/#comment-79572</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Bridgit Gilmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://badatsports.com/2008/controversial-exhibition-suspended-in-san-francisco/#comment-79572</guid>
		<description>While animal suffering occurs in the real world (ref: sfai story) and is a valid and, indeed necessary, topic for discussion, I am offended that it would ever be promoted as art.  To cause suffering for the sake of that &#039;art&#039; delibertely (ref: artist starves animal to death) should be offensive to any civilized person and cannot be considered art by any sane person.  This is called animal cruelty and abuse and the &#039;artist&#039; should have been tied up and starved.  Wonder what he would have thought of his &#039;art&#039; at the end of the week?

Dr. Bridgit Gilmore
Scotland</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While animal suffering occurs in the real world (ref: sfai story) and is a valid and, indeed necessary, topic for discussion, I am offended that it would ever be promoted as art.  To cause suffering for the sake of that &#8216;art&#8217; delibertely (ref: artist starves animal to death) should be offensive to any civilized person and cannot be considered art by any sane person.  This is called animal cruelty and abuse and the &#8216;artist&#8217; should have been tied up and starved.  Wonder what he would have thought of his &#8216;art&#8217; at the end of the week?</p>
<p>Dr. Bridgit Gilmore<br />
Scotland</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

