Comments on: Episode 115: Judy Ledgerwood with guest host Tony Tasset

By: Big Tits and Curvy Asses

Big Tits and Curvy Asses — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 11:25:05 +0000

Big Tits and Curvy Asses…

Interesting thing was, on Monday, I was actually at Google visiting for lunch. I was waiting in the lobby when one of the people who I was with saw the Governator on the front page of the Chronicle and picked up the paper. I saw myself on the top left …

By: Bahl Zack

Bahl Zack — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:51:42 +0000

Are you high or simply incoherent?

By: Russell Maycumber

Russell Maycumber — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:25:03 +0000

There are definite gender issues here but the live action dynamics is much more interesting than the incestual labrynth all be it personally fascinating art world dribble. There are three men in that room and one women, I think she holds her own.-Hot and spicey.

By: Steve Hamann

Steve Hamann — Thu, 15 Nov 2007 03:13:43 +0000

I thought this episode was pretty darn entertaining.

Any episode that has RunDMC gets a thumbs up in my book.

By: Caliope

Caliope — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:00:10 +0000

why would a contemporary artist (Ledgerwood) be overly concerned with the big bad group of hyper-male AbEx artists? This is not 1957. Those issues have already been worked out by scores of other artists, even by their own wives.

This is not to discount Ledgerwood’s paintings, though. Just get a different reason for painting. Your painting is not important simply because you invoke Pollock.

By: katie

katie — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:31:50 +0000

thank you, judy.

By: David Roth

David Roth — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:44:49 +0000

I love it when people refer to “most people.” I’m not saying you’re wrong Peter, I just wonder…

By: peter noser

peter noser — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:30:44 +0000

Not here. Whether you know anything or not, David, is beside the point. The boredom shown here in the lack of comments has nothing to do with any opposite group, whether you are in it or not. This isn’t about you. To repeat, most people find this ‘classic’ podcast, the explanation and this art boring. We are not afraid, we are bored. One of my bottom five.

By: David Roth

David Roth — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:32:13 +0000

Well, Peter, I don’t think Duncan was referring to me when he referred to the smackdown, since I’m rather agnostic on the subject.

I don’t know if I’ve ever been much good at being “sharkie” anyhow – I’ve sorta hung up my fin. I’m more interested in concepts in this case. Regardless of the relative merits of the works in question (I’ve got very little opinion on them, having had very little exposure to them), there’s usually something interesting to dig into.

By: peter noser

peter noser — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:04:58 +0000

Oh come on. You blame the Sharks if they are here and if they are not. One, David, is here, and is that a smack down? I think the amount of commentary comes from the subject. Most people find this ‘classic’ podcast, the explanation and this art boring. We are not afraid, we are bored. One of my bottom five.