Comments on: Art stolen for the sum of it’s parts http://badatsports.com/2007/art-stolen-for-the-sum-of-its-parts/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss Contemporay art talk without the ego Wed, 09 May 2012 17:09:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Bowl shack http://badatsports.com/2007/art-stolen-for-the-sum-of-its-parts/comment-page-1/#comment-5889 Bowl shack Sat, 03 Mar 2007 22:34:23 +0000 http://badatsports.com/blog/?p=97#comment-5889 Sounds plausible. Wouldn't be the first hoax in the art world. Sounds plausible.

Wouldn’t be the first hoax in the art world.

]]> By: minimal maximal http://badatsports.com/2007/art-stolen-for-the-sum-of-its-parts/comment-page-1/#comment-5869 minimal maximal Sat, 03 Mar 2007 19:14:01 +0000 http://badatsports.com/blog/?p=97#comment-5869 Will this scenario unravel to be a hoax? Think about it, this could easily be a staged intervention. The only aspect that makes me somewhat convinced that this piece isn't a trickster publicity stunt is the fact that the work is already sold. However, without the work sold, you have a relatively mundane and unactivated forum of art market/capitalism issues at hand. The work needed to be sold in order to generate the gammet of discourse the artist desired. Although more importantly the work needed to be stolen in order to generate this type of interest. Will this scenario unravel to be a hoax? Think about it, this could easily be a staged intervention. The only aspect that makes me somewhat convinced that this piece isn’t a trickster publicity stunt is the fact that the work is already sold. However, without the work sold, you have a relatively mundane and unactivated forum of art market/capitalism issues at hand. The work needed to be sold in order to generate the gammet of discourse the artist desired. Although more importantly the work needed to be stolen in order to generate this type of interest.

]]> By: Balzac http://badatsports.com/2007/art-stolen-for-the-sum-of-its-parts/comment-page-1/#comment-5486 Balzac Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:34:14 +0000 http://badatsports.com/blog/?p=97#comment-5486 You're damn riiight, SOLID-gold You’re damn riiight, SOLID-gold

]]> By: katie sehr http://badatsports.com/2007/art-stolen-for-the-sum-of-its-parts/comment-page-1/#comment-5474 katie sehr Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:36:57 +0000 http://badatsports.com/blog/?p=97#comment-5474 http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2007/02/22/style/tmagazine/20070225_LINES_SLIDESHOW_2.html http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2007/02/22/style/tmagazine/20070225_LINES_SLIDESHOW_3.html http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2007/02/22/style/tmagazine/20070225_LINES_SLIDESHOW_2.html

http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2007/02/22/style/tmagazine/20070225_LINES_SLIDESHOW_3.html

]]> By: katie sehr http://badatsports.com/2007/art-stolen-for-the-sum-of-its-parts/comment-page-1/#comment-5472 katie sehr Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:31:22 +0000 http://badatsports.com/blog/?p=97#comment-5472 funny and of coarse not related at all to whatever you are talking about...but i have to wonder.. http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2007/02/22/style/tmagazine/20070225_LINES_SLIDESHOW_1.html funny and of coarse not related at all to whatever you are talking about…but i have to wonder..

http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2007/02/22/style/tmagazine/20070225_LINES_SLIDESHOW_1.html

]]> By: anonymous http://badatsports.com/2007/art-stolen-for-the-sum-of-its-parts/comment-page-1/#comment-5471 anonymous Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:30:03 +0000 http://badatsports.com/blog/?p=97#comment-5471 Come on B, aren't your bahlz made of solid gold? Don't front. Come on B, aren’t your bahlz made of solid gold? Don’t front.

]]> By: Hudgens http://badatsports.com/2007/art-stolen-for-the-sum-of-its-parts/comment-page-1/#comment-5333 Hudgens Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:57:51 +0000 http://badatsports.com/blog/?p=97#comment-5333 Mine either, I could not imagine doing a work that expensive out of pocket. Part of me, the jaded artist/businessman feels they were kind of hoping it would happen. It being the cheapest world wide news coverage you can buy but it only works once then not again for a good while. Mine either, I could not imagine doing a work that expensive out of pocket. Part of me, the jaded artist/businessman feels they were kind of hoping it would happen. It being the cheapest world wide news coverage you can buy but it only works once then not again for a good while.

]]> By: Bahlzaq http://badatsports.com/2007/art-stolen-for-the-sum-of-its-parts/comment-page-1/#comment-5331 Bahlzaq Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:37:33 +0000 http://badatsports.com/blog/?p=97#comment-5331 Not in my world! Not in my world!

]]> By: anonymous http://badatsports.com/2007/art-stolen-for-the-sum-of-its-parts/comment-page-1/#comment-5325 anonymous Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:39:05 +0000 http://badatsports.com/blog/?p=97#comment-5325 $16,300 is a "relatively small amount of money?" $16,300 is a “relatively small amount of money?”

]]> By: brad farwell http://badatsports.com/2007/art-stolen-for-the-sum-of-its-parts/comment-page-1/#comment-5324 brad farwell Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:16:18 +0000 http://badatsports.com/blog/?p=97#comment-5324 Wow. That's so incredibly awesome. I think the empty frame makes it a MUCH better artwork than the piece was before (seemed sort of obvious and very similar to other work). I can't even say how cool that is. Which is perhaps for the best. b Wow. That’s so incredibly awesome. I think the empty frame makes it a MUCH better artwork than the piece was before (seemed sort of obvious and very similar to other work).

I can’t even say how cool that is.

Which is perhaps for the best.

b

]]>